The latest Washington Post/ABC News poll indicates that both Democrats and Republicans see Iraq as the most important issue in the 2008 elections. Most people recognize that US national security is tied to an autonomous stable Iraq, however, the best way to achieve this has and will be hotly debated. The current situation in Iraq is bad, no two ways about it. The Bush administration is leaning heavily on military commanders to establish a level of stability that will allow the majority of ground forces to leave and let Iraq start their democratic journey. General Petraeus's May letter to Iraqi's sends a genuine message hope but compels Iraqis to take ownership of their struggle for freedom. We need more of these leadership appeals from across the political spectrum, rather than legislation of arbitrary time lines, to convey a sense of urgency to Iraq without giving those trying to destabilize the country a light at the end of the tunnel to surge toward. The effect of such a strategy will result in increasing support from the Iraqi populace, a tightening noose around elements and their surrogates (Iran, Syria) that want Iraq as a country to fail and fewer coalition and Iraqi casualties. This is the quickest path to get our troops home and preserve our vital national security interest in Iraq.
Showing posts with label Iraq. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iraq. Show all posts
03 June 2007
02 June 2007
Ron Paul Straight Talk?
Presidential candidate Ron Paul, Rep from Texas, publishes a weekly column named Straight Talk. In his 21 May column on the War in Iraq, Paul refuses to take a position for or against the current action in Iraq. Instead he sidesteps the issue and calls for legislation that would end the original authorization to go to war in Iraq thereby forcing Congress to pass a new authorization or update the original. Does Paul seriously think this will be a catalyst for change?
Presidential candidate Ron Paul, Rep from Texas, publishes a weekly column named Straight Talk. In his 21 May column on the War in Iraq, Paul refuses to take a position for or against the current action in Iraq. Instead he sidesteps the issue and calls for legislation that would end the original authorization to go to war in Iraq thereby forcing Congress to pass a new authorization or update the original. Does Paul seriously think this will be a catalyst for change?
31 May 2007
It's Iraq stupid! Success or failure in Iraq will determine the fate of the 08 elections. If President Bush's revised strategy doesn't stabilize the country the Reps don't have a snowball's chance in 08. Despite this they continue to abandon ship virtually ensuring his strategy will fail. The losers will be the common Iraqi man, women and child and the western World as terrorist attacks become more frequent and devastating. So does anybody in the Rep race have a spine to stick with the Pres?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)